76 research outputs found
Synthesising Graphical Theories
In recent years, diagrammatic languages have been shown to be a powerful and
expressive tool for reasoning about physical, logical, and semantic processes
represented as morphisms in a monoidal category. In particular, categorical
quantum mechanics, or "Quantum Picturalism", aims to turn concrete features of
quantum theory into abstract structural properties, expressed in the form of
diagrammatic identities. One way we search for these properties is to start
with a concrete model (e.g. a set of linear maps or finite relations) and start
composing generators into diagrams and looking for graphical identities.
Naively, we could automate this procedure by enumerating all diagrams up to a
given size and check for equalities, but this is intractable in practice
because it produces far too many equations. Luckily, many of these identities
are not primitive, but rather derivable from simpler ones. In 2010, Johansson,
Dixon, and Bundy developed a technique called conjecture synthesis for
automatically generating conjectured term equations to feed into an inductive
theorem prover. In this extended abstract, we adapt this technique to
diagrammatic theories, expressed as graph rewrite systems, and demonstrate its
application by synthesising a graphical theory for studying entangled quantum
states.Comment: 10 pages, 22 figures. Shortened and one theorem adde
Tensors, !-graphs, and non-commutative quantum structures
Categorical quantum mechanics (CQM) and the theory of quantum groups rely
heavily on the use of structures that have both an algebraic and co-algebraic
component, making them well-suited for manipulation using diagrammatic
techniques. Diagrams allow us to easily form complex compositions of
(co)algebraic structures, and prove their equality via graph rewriting. One of
the biggest challenges in going beyond simple rewriting-based proofs is
designing a graphical language that is expressive enough to prove interesting
properties (e.g. normal form results) about not just single diagrams, but
entire families of diagrams. One candidate is the language of !-graphs, which
consist of graphs with certain subgraphs marked with boxes (called !-boxes)
that can be repeated any number of times. New !-graph equations can then be
proved using a powerful technique called !-box induction. However, previously
this technique only applied to commutative (or cocommutative) algebraic
structures, severely limiting its applications in some parts of CQM and
(especially) quantum groups. In this paper, we fix this shortcoming by offering
a new semantics for non-commutative !-graphs using an enriched version of
Penrose's abstract tensor notation.Comment: In Proceedings QPL 2014, arXiv:1412.810
ZH: A Complete Graphical Calculus for Quantum Computations Involving Classical Non-linearity
We present a new graphical calculus that is sound and complete for a
universal family of quantum circuits, which can be seen as the natural
string-diagrammatic extension of the approximately (real-valued) universal
family of Hadamard+CCZ circuits. The diagrammatic language is generated by two
kinds of nodes: the so-called 'spider' associated with the computational basis,
as well as a new arity-N generalisation of the Hadamard gate, which satisfies a
variation of the spider fusion law. Unlike previous graphical calculi, this
admits compact encodings of non-linear classical functions. For example, the
AND gate can be depicted as a diagram of just 2 generators, compared to ~25 in
the ZX-calculus. Consequently, N-controlled gates, hypergraph states,
Hadamard+Toffoli circuits, and diagonal circuits at arbitrary levels of the
Clifford hierarchy also enjoy encodings with low constant overhead. This
suggests that this calculus will be significantly more convenient for reasoning
about the interplay between classical non-linear behaviour (e.g. in an oracle)
and purely quantum operations. After presenting the calculus, we will prove it
is sound and complete for universal quantum computation by demonstrating the
reduction of any diagram to an easily describable normal form.Comment: In Proceedings QPL 2018, arXiv:1901.0947
Open Graphs and Monoidal Theories
String diagrams are a powerful tool for reasoning about physical processes,
logic circuits, tensor networks, and many other compositional structures. The
distinguishing feature of these diagrams is that edges need not be connected to
vertices at both ends, and these unconnected ends can be interpreted as the
inputs and outputs of a diagram. In this paper, we give a concrete construction
for string diagrams using a special kind of typed graph called an open-graph.
While the category of open-graphs is not itself adhesive, we introduce the
notion of a selective adhesive functor, and show that such a functor embeds the
category of open-graphs into the ambient adhesive category of typed graphs.
Using this functor, the category of open-graphs inherits "enough adhesivity"
from the category of typed graphs to perform double-pushout (DPO) graph
rewriting. A salient feature of our theory is that it ensures rewrite systems
are "type-safe" in the sense that rewriting respects the inputs and outputs.
This formalism lets us safely encode the interesting structure of a
computational model, such as evaluation dynamics, with succinct, explicit
rewrite rules, while the graphical representation absorbs many of the tedious
details. Although topological formalisms exist for string diagrams, our
construction is discreet, finitary, and enjoys decidable algorithms for
composition and rewriting. We also show how open-graphs can be parametrised by
graphical signatures, similar to the monoidal signatures of Joyal and Street,
which define types for vertices in the diagrammatic language and constraints on
how they can be connected. Using typed open-graphs, we can construct free
symmetric monoidal categories, PROPs, and more general monoidal theories. Thus
open-graphs give us a handle for mechanised reasoning in monoidal categories.Comment: 31 pages, currently technical report, submitted to MSCS, waiting
review
A first-order logic for string diagrams
Equational reasoning with string diagrams provides an intuitive means of
proving equations between morphisms in a symmetric monoidal category. This can
be extended to proofs of infinite families of equations using a simple
graphical syntax called !-box notation. While this does greatly increase the
proving power of string diagrams, previous attempts to go beyond equational
reasoning have been largely ad hoc, owing to the lack of a suitable logical
framework for diagrammatic proofs involving !-boxes. In this paper, we extend
equational reasoning with !-boxes to a fully-fledged first order logic called
with conjunction, implication, and universal quantification over !-boxes. This
logic, called !L, is then rich enough to properly formalise an induction
principle for !-boxes. We then build a standard model for !L and give an
example proof of a theorem for non-commutative bialgebras using !L, which is
unobtainable by equational reasoning alone.Comment: 15 pages + appendi
!-Graphs with Trivial Overlap are Context-Free
String diagrams are a powerful tool for reasoning about composite structures
in symmetric monoidal categories. By representing string diagrams as graphs,
equational reasoning can be done automatically by double-pushout rewriting.
!-graphs give us the means of expressing and proving properties about whole
families of these graphs simultaneously. While !-graphs provide elegant proofs
of surprisingly powerful theorems, little is known about the formal properties
of the graph languages they define. This paper takes the first step in
characterising these languages by showing that an important subclass of
!-graphs--those whose repeated structures only overlap trivially--can be
encoded using a (context-free) vertex replacement grammar.Comment: In Proceedings GaM 2015, arXiv:1504.0244
- …